Does telepathy conflict with science ?
By Chris Carter
More scientists and skeptics than ever consider psychic phenomena to be a possibility on some level.
The idea of extrasensory perception is not a new one, studies and  experiments have been conducted for decades for both scientific research  purposes and for use in military applications. While few scientists  today would outright state with any certainty that psychic abilities do  exist, most would be unwilling to make the claim that they do not  either.Recently, journalist Steven Volk was  surprised to discover that leading skeptical psychologist Richard  Wiseman has admitted that the evidence for telepathy is so good that “by  the standards of any other area of science, [telepathy] is proven.” Mr.  Volk goes on to write, “Even more incredibly, as I report in  Fringe-ology, another leading skeptic, Chris French, agrees with him.”
Mr. Volk might even be more surprised to learn that back in 1951 psychologist Donald Hebb wrote this:
“Why do we not accept ESP [extrasensory  perception] as a psychological fact? [The Rhine Research Center] has  offered enough evidence to have convinced us on almost any other issue …  Personally, I do not accept ESP for a moment, because it does not make  sense. My external criteria, both of physics and of physiology, say that  ESP is not a fact despite the behavioral evidence that has been  reported. I cannot see what other basis my colleagues have for rejecting  it … Rhine may still turn out to be right, improbable as I think that  is, and my own rejection of his view is—in the literal sense—prejudice.”
Four years later, George Price, then a  research associate at the Department of Medicine at the University of  Minnesota, published an article in the prestigious journal Science that  began:
“Believers in psychic phenomena … appear  to have won a decisive victory and virtually silenced opposition. …  This victory is the result of careful experimentation and intelligent  argumentation. Dozens of experimenters have obtained positive results in  ESP experiments, and the mathematical procedures have been approved by  leading statisticians. … Against all this evidence, almost the only  defense remaining to the skeptical scientist is ignorance.”
But Price then argued, “ESP is incompatible with current scientific theory,” and asked:
“If, then, parapsychology and modern  science are incompatible, why not reject parapsychology? … The choice is  between believing in something ‘truly revolutionary’ and ‘radically  contradictory to contemporary thought’ and believing in the occurrence  of fraud and self-delusion. Which is more reasonable?”


