新世界秩序: 麻省理工和羅馬預言: 2030年全球經濟大蕭條和人口減少

Global Great Depression and Population Reduction by 2030: MIT and The Club of Rome Prophecy
Michael EdwardsActivist Post

As tyranny continues its march out into the open, it is increasingly becoming cloaked in green.  Under the guise of saving humanity, a chorus of recent announcements within elite circles, think-tanks, educational institutions, and the halls of science are calling for drastic measures to stop the planet’s inevitable implosion from an overshot carrying capacity.
A U.N policy paper recently outlined the building blocks for a world government that would enforce a “heavy-handed” approach toward humanity’s impact on the environment, as this new epoch of The Anthropocene Age has begun to negatively alter the planet in irrevocable ways.
A rather infamous book, from a rather infamous group called The Club of Rome, is making a reappearance as humanity hurtles toward demise if its stewardship is not turned over to technocrats.  Limits to Growth (1972) is nothing short of a blueprint for population reduction and neo-feudalism; or, as Yale economist Henry Wallich stated at the time of its release, its implementation means “consigning billions to poverty.”
It appears that this plan has been green-lighted by the elite, as recent MIT research validates the conclusions drawn by Limits to Growth at this crucial time when we see the world economy imploding, and a jack-booted green police ready to hit the streets.  According to MIT, we are headed toward a guaranteed planet-wide economic collapse and “precipitous population decline” if we do not heed the words of The Club of Rome.

天眼通(Remote Viewer)預言在2013年之前會有災難性的流星撞擊地球

By Dan Eden
View-Zone

This story will blow your mind. That’s what usually happens to us when we learn something about the world that seems totally irrational — but true. In this story we are dealing with time, the future to be exact, and the existence of multiple and different futures.
But wait! If you think this is some pseudo-science, you’re dead wrong. Because the proof of this scientificdiscovery comes with a hefty price tag: a global disaster by 2013.
Back in 2008 some predictions were made by a team of the top, military trained “remote viewers” — each with over a decade of successful service. Lyn Buchanan from US Army Intelligence and Glenn Wheaton, of US Special Forces participated in a project run by Farsight Institute originally designed to detect minute climate changes at selected targets around the globe. Instead of climate change, the remote viewers saw a huge meteoric impact in the ocean with devastating tidal waves and volcanism. All this happening by 2013.
The results were unexpected but should be taken seriously. It appears that the governments of the world are already preparing for such an event. The scientific community believes these predictions to be so strong and reliable that they proposed to let the reputation of remote viewing, as a science, rest upon this horrible prediction.
You need to know about this. It’s real.
First, what is Remote Viewing?
Remote Viewing is a talent where some individuals can get information from events and places that are far away in both distance and time. The phenomenon is not completely understood but has been repeatedly validated by experiments.
Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s, following the declassification of documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program sponsored by the U.S. Federal Government to determine if there was any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was “terminated” in 1995, citing a lack of documented evidence that the program had any value to the intelligence community. At least that’s the “official” position.
Many believe that the abilities of Remote Viewers are present in most people, and can be developed with the right instruction. That alone is perhaps reason enough to “officially” deny that it has any value.

A brief history of Remote Viewing  One of the most successful remote viewers was Joseph McMoneagle [pictured on the left]. His track record remains classified, however it was impressive enough to have been awarded the U.S. Army’s Legion of Merit Medal, one of the highest meritorious awards given to a civilian in America. Joe McMoneagle was originally recruited to join the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) by Skip Atwater [pictured on the right]. Skip worked with the Department of Defense (DoD) to find suitable candidates based on how long they had remained in certain difficult overseas positions. If a certain position had a statistical average of, say, 6 months before the officer either requested or was forced to change his assignment, the recruiter would look for an officer who had remained longer than average. The thinking was that the officer must have some coping mechanism. It was believed that this mechanism was related to psi abilities. In McMoneagle’s case, he remained in his position for a dozen years beyond the average time served in his job. McMoneagle was the first remote viewer in the program and was given the designation “#001″ and has the reputation as being the best of the best remote viewers. McMoneagle was somewhat unusual in that the way he received his target assignments was what is called a “double blind” method. The photograph or description of the target was placed inside an envelope, which was placed inside yet another envelope and was often in a different room from where Joe did his remote viewing. In other words: Joe did his remote viewing without being informed of the target. That information did exist, but was not shown to Joe prior to his viewing session. This elaborate procedure was specifically designed to avoid what remote viewers call “front loading”, where any hint or knowledge of the target can pollute the session and distract the viewer from receiving the subconscious perceptions. McMoneagle was always sure not to have a clue about the target. This kind of weirdness was a clue that there was something unusual about time. Remote viewing requires the viewer to get into a kind of trance or meditative state. Over the years, McMoneagle obtained additional training on a meditative technique called “Hemi-Sync©”, developed by the Monroe Institute. This technique uses sounds of different frequencies, delivered through headphones, to harmonize the brain waves of the remote viewer, enabling them to quickly and more efficiently obtain access to their subconscious mind. According to McMoneagle, after using the recorded sounds for many years he no longer needs to use the headphones and can think about the sounds to obtain the same effect. The team at Stanford explored the abilities of many remote viewers to view and report on real-time events. In some instances they were to explore secret military sites, both domestic and abroad, and they achieved great success. But the most fascinating aspect of remote viewing is the ability of a remote viewer to see and describe the future.

How Remote Viewing Works…
and then those 2012/2013 predictions! In remote viewing there are always three events that take place: the Remote Viewing Attempt (RVA), where the remote viewer actually tries to see the target event in the future. Then there is the target event (TE) — the thing the remote viewer is trying to see — and finally the Task Assignment (TA) — where some person gives the assignment of what the remote viewer should be looking for.
When remote viewing a future event, the traditional protocol was of the order TA – RVA – TE. In other words, some person would sit the remote viewer down and explain the time and location of some future event (TA), then the Remote Viewer would attempt to ‘see’ it and describe it (RVA), and finally there is the actual event that happens later (TE). This makes sense to us. It’s the linear progression of time. But the procedure didn’t always result in good predictions.
Some researchers tried a different sequence of RVA – TE – TA and it worked much better. According to Farsight Institute’s spokesman, Dr. Courtney Brown:

“We have successfully been able to, in a deterministic manner, describe the future each and every time.” [*]

In this protocol, the remote viewer is still attempting to describe a future event, but the person assigning the task does so only after the Remote Viewer has viewed and described the target. Confused?
An example of this highly successful protocol follows: It’s January. The remote viewer is asked to ‘see’ some future event that will be assigned to him in March. With that instruction, some event is seen, written down or drawn and then put in a safe. It is known only to the remote viewer. In March, the target is assigned to the same Remote Viewer — who has already made his predictions two months earlier. The target is some event that happened in February.
It sounds irrational but it works. Why?

The theory is that we live in multiple universes or multiple futures. The path of past-present-future is our reality timeline. From the perspective of the present, the past is fixed and unchangeable. It happened already. But the future appears to take many different paths of possibility. Knowing which path is on our timeline is required to view the real future events. Is this possible?

At each moment we are at an intersection with many paths leading to future events. By placing some known event in the future we are, in effect, calling out or putting up a sign that says, “Over here! This is the real timeline!” In order to “see” the future accurately there must be a “marker” event — an attractor of sorts — to pull us in to certain paths of possibilities. Since the target event was chosen in the future, the unique future where the event happened has been established. The path is then followed by the remote viewer, allowing him to visualize the events of the future. It can therefore be predicted.
Here’s a great video in which Dr. Brown explains the protocol for describing future events. His terms are a bit different from my explanation but the meaning is the same.

Remote Viewing 2012-2013: not good news…
In 2008 a team of 8 military grade remote viewers were asked to view several targets with the understanding that the actual target assignments for each session would be given to them in the future. The sessions were given a number (S1, S2…) and the notes and drawings from each session were collected, scanned, encrypted and subsequently downloaded by tens of thousands of internet users for some future date, when the encryption codes would be published. This guaranteed that the results of the remote viewing sessions could not be changed.
There was a total of 113 sessions. Once the sessions had been recorded, the targets were selected in a random manner, pairing each session with one of three possible target conditions in 9 different locations around the globe:
1. Vaitupu, Tuvalu
2. Fort Jesus, Mombasa Kenya
3. Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia
4. Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
5. United States Congress Building, Washington, D.C.
6. Malé International Airport, Malé, Maldives
7. KITV Building, Honolulu, Hawaii
8. The Vehicle Assembly Building at Launch Complex 39, Kennedy Space Center, Merritt Island, Florida
9. Key West, Florida
The three conditions were:
1. The date of June 2008
A. “June 1, 2013, 12 noon target local time, following the timeline in which the leadership of the mainstream global scientific establishment continues to ignore or deny (1) the reality of the remote-viewing phenomenon, and (2) the existence of life not originating from Earth.”
B. “June 1, 2013, 12 noon target local time, following the timeline in which by the end of 2009 leaders of the mainstream global scientific establishment publicly recognize (1) the reality of the remote-viewin phenomenon, and (2) the existence of life not originating from Earth.”
Each remote viewing session that had already been recorded was associated with a specific geographic location and condition. The results, originally thought to show changes in sea levels and climate, were dramatic.
Those sessions which were linked to assignments in 2008 showed the locations as they were. An example is seen below. This session was linked to the Sydney Opera House (at sea level).

The descriptions of Tanzania’s Mt. Kilimanjaro are also as one would expect in 2008 [below].

But something radically wrong happens when either condition 2013-A or 2013-B is assigned.

Descriptions of something bright in the sky, of people looking up in amazement, followed by mass organized migrations from the coastal regions.

A summary of what was seen by these remote viewers looks like this: In general, these remote-viewing data suggest the following types of physical changes across many of the above geographical locations by mid-2013:
1. Impacts from what appear to be large meteors leading to tsunamis and possible volcanism
2. Extensive and forceful flooding of coastal areas
3. Excessive solar radiation
4. Storms and other severe weather
In terms of the effects of these changes on humans, these data also suggest:
1. Massive self-organized relocation from coastal areas (refugees)
2. The breakdown of rescue or other notable governmental functioning
3. The breakdown of the food supply system
4. The breakdown of the vehicular transport system
5. Extensive loss of buildings near coasts

source

fb病毒冒CNN稱爆「三戰」

(綜合報道)(星島日報報道)facebook最近被電腦病毒入侵，出現一個虛假新聞網頁，內容指美國揮軍伊朗及沙特阿拉伯，展開第三次世界大戰。該虛假網頁有美國CNN的標誌，並附有即時新聞片段畫面，但要求用戶先把Flash影像軟件升級，才可收看影片。用戶提升軟件時，實際上已受到木馬病毒入侵。電腦保安公司稱，最少已有六萬人受害。英國《每日郵報》

霍金千年預言地球毀滅

昨日是著名物理學家霍金（Stephen Hawking）的七十大壽，母校劍橋大學舉行科研會慶祝，不過他因身體不適而缺席。霍金日前應邀出席電台節目時，則預言核戰及全球暖化等災難，將於千年內摧毀地球，而人類需要盡早征服火星及宇宙，才能逃過絕種厄運。

英國廣播電台四台近日為慶祝霍金生日，推出「問問霍金」電台節目，聽眾透過社交網站及電郵向霍金提問。有聽眾問：「你認為人類能否逃過所有災難，並最終在其他星體殖民？」霍金答：「人類可能會絕種。我幾乎肯定有一種災難，好像核戰或全球暖化，將於一千年內降臨地球。」

身體不適缺席研討會

但霍金指人類滅絕並非無可避免，因為科技進步將帶領人類走出太陽系，到達宇宙的遠方。他相信：「我們最終能在火星或太陽系其他星體，建立自給自足的殖民地，但不會在一百年內。」他又警告，試圖與外星人溝通會很危險，情況如同當年歐洲人抵達美洲，對美洲土著來說並非好事。
英國劍橋大學在當地時間昨午（本港時間昨晚）舉行題為「宇宙狀態」的公開科學研討會，為霍金慶生；霍金原定在本港時間今日凌晨登 場，發表題為《我的簡史》的演講。不過劍橋校長博里塞維奇昨日宣布，霍金身體不適，上周五才出院，將缺席研討會。會上亦邀來去年諾貝爾物理學獎得主佩爾穆 特，以及美國加利福尼亞理工學院物理學者索恩等嘉賓演講物理課題。昔日與霍金在劍橋攻讀博士學位的尼斯教授也是講者之一，他曾以為霍金會因病完成不了課 程，但霍金創造了奇迹。

http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/china_world/20120109/00180_001.html

(有片)必看: 1961年美國總統已預言了我們的將來

2011年10月17日 8:07:05

This Video may help you understand the diffuculty that all our elected officials are facing. The temptation that our elected officials are confronted with today is overwhelming. Most Cave in: Lie, cheat, steal, survive....
They are trained to take Bribes, confuse their supporters, and deliver the results to thier .........



http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1240/578/Our_Future:_Predicted_In_1961_-_The_President_Who_Told_The_Truth_Must_See_Video.html