Alien, UFO, Conspiracy, 2012, Freemasons, Illuminati, New World Order, Bilderberg Group, World War 3, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Vatican, Black Nobility, Fourth Reich, Paranormal Phenomena. Main purpose of this blog is to explore New World Order and how it related to our real life. Blog updated daily.
揭秘外星人，飛碟，陰謀論，2012，共濟會，光明會，新世界秩序，標達堡，第3次世界大戰，錫安長老會紀要，梵蒂岡，黑貴族，德意志第四帝國及超自然現象。資料訊息來自互聯網，Blog每天更新，這是一個開放的平台讓各網友了解有關新世界秩序的最新消息。
On July 1, 2012, the Australian Government will introduce a Globalist-backed carbon tax. The carbon tax will begin at a fixed price of $23 per tonne of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere.
Cloaked by the lies and deception of the science that has persuaded the Australian Government that climate change is real, the Globalists have now began to change the fundamental structure of the booming Australian economy. The real cost of a carbon tax on the Australian economy and how it will affect Australian families directly was hidden by the Globalists and the Australian Government when they were selling the carbon tax to the Australian public. Now that Australia is about to introduce a Globalist carbon tax, Australian businesses have begun to change the way they do business in Australia and this is now impacting ordinary Australians.
Firstly, the immediate impact of a carbon tax will be felt by charitable organizations. The Salvation Army, one of Australia’s largest charitable organizations, has revealed that a carbon tax will cost them an additional $3.5 million dollars and that this could impact on the services they provide to about 300,000 people a year of which includes emergency accommodation and drug and alcohol counseling.
Secondly, to make matters even worse for charitable organisations and ordinary Australians, electricity companies are refusing to tell struggling families and businesses exactly how much the carbon tax will add to their power bills.
The Australian federal government estimates electricity prices will increase by up to 10 per cent when the tax kicks in on July 1, 2012, however there have been reports that electricity prices will in fact increase by up to 20% and more.
This morning, we're talking about noise pollution and the negative health affects it can cause. In Minneapolis' Seward neighborhood, you can find the world's quietest room.
The room, which holds the Guinness World Record designation, is located in the Orfield Laboratories. The recording studios where "Funkytown" and Bob Dylan's "Blood on the Tracks" were recorded are also in this building.
The world's quietest room is called an anechoic chamber, which means there is no echo as it absorbs sound. Sound doesn't bounce off the walls the way it does in a regular room.
A typical quiet room you sleep in at night measures about 30 decibels. A normal conversation is about 60 decibels. This room has been measured at -9 decibels.
Orfield Labs uses the room to test products, including switches that go on car dashboards and the sound an LED display makes on a cell phone to make sure they're not too loud.
To get into the anechoic chamber, you go through two bank vault-like doors. The floor in the room is mesh like a trampoline so there's nothing on the floor for the sound to bounce off of. The walls are lined with sound-proofing wedges that are a meter long so they absorb the sound.
"When you sit in any rooms a person normally sits in, you hear the sound and all its reflections," said Steven Orfield, president of Orfield Labs. "When you go into an anechoic chamber, there are zero reflections. So if you listen to me talk and hear my voice, you're hearing my voice exactly. And if I turn around and talk, the only thing you'll hear is the sound bending around my head."
計劃興建的望遠鏡稱為「平方公里陣列」（Square Kilometer Array，SKA），完工後將會是全球最強的射電望遠鏡（radio telescope），較目前最強射電望遠鏡的敏感度高50倍、反應快1000倍，整個計劃涉資高達20億歐元（約200億港元），預計2016年興建、 2021年完工，可以觀測到50光年外星體上的無線電波信號。出資興建望遠鏡的財團稱，望遠鏡將會讓天文學家對大爆炸後星體形成有更多的理解。
There’s a new monster on San Diego beaches, and he looks rough.
He’s got a bleach-blonde mohawk, sunburned skin, and a pair of really vicious-looking fangs. And don’t even ask about the body odor, which is bad enough to draw flies. But don’t worry, he (or she) is dead. (Though, like all movie monsters, it might come back to life at the last moment, setting up a sequel.)
Photos of the 24-inch animal carcass were taken last week by a 19-year-old snowboarder visiting San Diego’s Pacific Beach. He showed them to a friend, who passed it along to another friend, who e-mailed them to Rocco Castoro of the Vice.com blog with the subject line: “Chupacabra/Montauk Monster-looking creature.”
As Castoro noted,
The Ten Commandments of the Internet dictate that anyone who receives images of a “monster” is obligated to disseminate and investigate them, even though incidents like this seem to happen about once a year these days. This one apparently turned up on Pacific Beach in San Diego last week.” Castoro spoke to the man who found it, and the surfer dude “sounded sincere and naive enough (i.e. like Jeff Spicoli) to convince me that he undoubtedly believes this thing was, at one time, a living and breathing mutant hellbeast, or at the very least a member of the aforementioned Chupacabra genus. He also told me it was about two feet in length, and that ‘it had the body shape of a pig—kind of a fat stomach, middle area. And the canines were just ridiculously large…. I didn’t know if it was some creature from around here. I’m from Massachusetts and I don’t see [stuff] like that ever.’”
More scientists and skeptics than ever consider psychic phenomena to be a possibility on some level.
The idea of extrasensory perception is not a new one, studies and experiments have been conducted for decades for both scientific research purposes and for use in military applications. While few scientists today would outright state with any certainty that psychic abilities do exist, most would be unwilling to make the claim that they do not either.
Recently, journalist Steven Volk was surprised to discover that leading skeptical psychologist Richard Wiseman has admitted that the evidence for telepathy is so good that “by the standards of any other area of science, [telepathy] is proven.” Mr. Volk goes on to write, “Even more incredibly, as I report in Fringe-ology, another leading skeptic, Chris French, agrees with him.”
Mr. Volk might even be more surprised to learn that back in 1951 psychologist Donald Hebb wrote this:
“Why do we not accept ESP [extrasensory perception] as a psychological fact? [The Rhine Research Center] has offered enough evidence to have convinced us on almost any other issue … Personally, I do not accept ESP for a moment, because it does not make sense. My external criteria, both of physics and of physiology, say that ESP is not a fact despite the behavioral evidence that has been reported. I cannot see what other basis my colleagues have for rejecting it … Rhine may still turn out to be right, improbable as I think that is, and my own rejection of his view is—in the literal sense—prejudice.”
Four years later, George Price, then a research associate at the Department of Medicine at the University of Minnesota, published an article in the prestigious journal Science that began:
“Believers in psychic phenomena … appear to have won a decisive victory and virtually silenced opposition. … This victory is the result of careful experimentation and intelligent argumentation. Dozens of experimenters have obtained positive results in ESP experiments, and the mathematical procedures have been approved by leading statisticians. … Against all this evidence, almost the only defense remaining to the skeptical scientist is ignorance.”
But Price then argued, “ESP is incompatible with current scientific theory,” and asked:
“If, then, parapsychology and modern science are incompatible, why not reject parapsychology? … The choice is between believing in something ‘truly revolutionary’ and ‘radically contradictory to contemporary thought’ and believing in the occurrence of fraud and self-delusion. Which is more reasonable?”
Made from Genetically Modified Bacteria Waste, Aspartame Risks Public Health
Andre Evans Activist Post
Aspartame is one of the most used artificial sweeteners in the food supply today. It also happens to be one of the most dangerous.
Aspartame is used in thousands of products as a substitute to sugar, though consumers would actually be better off eating regular sugar.
Specifically, the toxic substance is often found in diet soft drinks and various candies. You should also be aware that aspartame is even present in a number of lesser-known conventional products as well.
Millions either knowingly or unknowingly consume aspartame on a daily basis. However, if the public was aware of the various dangers aspartame poses to individual health, they would stop — or would they? Aspartame is an addictive substance.
Most people who consume diet sodas regularly soon develop a craving for it. This is because of aspartame’s addictive quality. Soon after consuming the ingredient on a normal basis, many people find themselves unable to kick the habit.
This is concerning due to the fact that aspartame has been linked to a number of diseases, can impair the immune system, and is even known to cause cancer. Aspartame has even been found to create tumors in lab rats. One study showed that of 48 rats experimented on, up to 67 percent of all female rats developed tumors roughly the size of golf balls or larger. This is glaringly in contrast to the perceived nature of what a ‘sugar free alternative’ would entail, which is generally thought to be a ‘healthy’ substitute to sugar.
Could it be that the flow of aether in the form of electric field is the true “electric current”, and electron flow is only a byproduct? Some researchers, including potentially Nikola Tesla, seem to think so!
by Hank Mills
Pure Energy Systems News
The modern day concept of electricity is pretty straightforward. Electrical current is defined by the motion of electrons traveling through a conductive material — usually a metal such as copper. With a few basic formulas engineers are able to electrify our world, keeping our lights and appliances running.
However, there are some researchers who argue that mainstream science ignores the “true” nature of electricity, and what really constitutes electric current. They claim mainstream science incorrectly eliminated the concept of the aether, or the all pervasive medium in which electromagnetic waves were originally thought to travel. By ignoring the work of the early pioneers of electromagnetism, and dumbing down the original equations of Maxwell (the father of electromagnetism) they are obscuring the aether as the true source of electricity. Nikola Tesla is an example of an individual who was convinced the aether existed, and built systems to harness it for the benefit of mankind. Some of his systems (today known as Tesla coils) used high frequency, high voltage discharges from capacitors to create disturbances in the aether. In some of his writings, he called these disturbances “impulses”, because he could feel radiant effects from them. Typically, he would have a primary coil of a few turns of wire that would direct these impulses towards a secondary coil. The secondary coil in the system was a flat pancake coil of many turns of wire that was placed inside of the primary. When in operation, the secondary coil would increase the “voltage” produced to very high levels. In his systems, the “tension” as he called it, could reach millions of volts.
2012: Aborted Babies Are Being Chopped Up And Sold To Researchers All Over America With The Full Approval Of The Obama Administration
Did you know that aborted babies are being chopped up and sold to medical researchers all over America? There is a federal law which is supposed to ban this practice, but it contains a gigantic loophole that abortion clinics are using to sell huge amounts of aborted baby parts to the scientific community. The loophole in the federal law allows “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” But there are no guidelines as to what those “reasonable payments” should be and the Obama administration is not about to start prosecuting abortion clinics. So aborted baby parts from American babies will continue to be very quietly sold for profit to medical researchers and most Americans will never hear anything about it. But future generations will look back in horror at what we allowed to be done right under our noses.
With the full approval of the Obama administration, one company in the United States has plans to inject aborted baby brain cells into the eyes of patients to see if that will help improve their vision. The following is from a recent article on LifeNews.com….
吃進普遍添加在自來水中、據稱能夠幫助預防齲齒的氟化鈉 (sodium fluoride) 實際上反而可能造成大腦、脊髓及坐骨神經受到神經退化性傷害，近來刊載於《Journal of Medical and Allied Sciences》期刊的一項研究及其他所有科學家發現的證據皆已經推翻氟化物不具危險性的迷思。
New Finding: Consuming Trans Fats Linked To Aggression
Sayer Ji, Contributing Writer
Activist Post
In the first human study of its kind researchers have linked trans fatty acid consumption to increased aggression. Published in the Public Library of Science’s own journal, PLoS, March 5th 2012, researchers at the Dept. of Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, reported:
“Dietary trans fatty acids (dTFA) are primarily synthetic compounds that have been introduced only recently; little is known about their behavioral effects. dTFA inhibit production of omega-3 fatty acids, which experimentally have been shown to reduce aggression. Potential behavioral effects of dTFA merit investigation. We sought to determine whether dTFA are associated with aggression/irritability.”
The study looked at 945 adult men and women who were not on lipid-lowering drugs, and who were without LDL-cholesterol extremes, diabetes, HIV, cancer or heart disease. Outcomes assessed adverse behaviors with impact on others based on both objective (life histories of aggression) and subjective (self-rated impatience and irritabilitly) sources of information. The researchers concluded:
“This study provides the first evidence linking dTFA [dietary trans fatty acids] with behavioral irritability and aggression.”
This novel finding adds to a growing body of existing clinical research indicating that synthetically produced trans fatty acids adversely affect human health, particularly cardiovascular health and cancer risk.
Due to the fact that the human brain (excluding water) is composed mostly of fatty acids, it is understandable how synthetically produced trans fats could adversely affect brain and psychiatric health. In fact, a recent animal study demonstrated that long-term trans fatty acid feeding in animals contributed to the incorporation of these fats in the brain, leading to increased susceptibility of developing movement disorders.
Given that this most recent finding links trans fatty acid consumption to possibly violent behavior towards others, a serious legal and moral question is raised as to whether regulatory agencies like the FDA can continue to allow their production and use without being in some way responsible for the damage that is afflicted upon the general population as a consequence.
This same question can be raised in regard to the 300+ adverse health effects that statin drugs have been linked to, not the least of which is increased violent behavior towards self (suicide and parasuicide) and other, as a consequence of having low cholesterol. In the same way that trans fatty acids may alter the physiology (and therefore function) of the neurological tissue itself, low cholesterol levels reduces the number of serotonin receptors in the brain, which in turn lowers brain serotonin, making it more difficult to suppress aggressive behavior.
RUSSIA. In the remote Kamchatka peninsula (map below), 200 km from Tigil, University of St. Petersburg archaeologists discovered a strange fossil. The authenticity of the find has been certified. According archaeologist Yuri Golubev, occurs that, in this case the discovery surprised scientists by its nature, at least – unusual, able to change history (or pre-history).
It is not the first time that is an artifact, an ancient object, something like this is found in that region. But, surprisingly conserved, this specific artifact is – at first glance, inlaid in rock (which is understandable since the peninsula is home to numerous volcanoes). Subjected to analysis, the conjunct showed to be made of metal parts that seem to form a mechanism, a gear which may be of a type of watch or computer. The astonishing is that all the pieces were dated in 400 million! of anos.Yury Gobulev commented:
We got a call from the prefec of Tigil. He told us that hikers that were walking in place, found these remains in rock. We went to the place indicated, and initially we not understand what we saw. There were – hundreds of toothed cylinders which appeared to be parts of a machine.
They were in perfect state of conservation, as if they were frozen in a short period of time. It was necessary control the area, because soon the curious began to appear in large numbers. Other scientists, americans geologists, defined the piece as an amazing and mysterious artifact.
Nobody could believe that 400 million years ago could have existed on Earth even a man (even more a machine). At that time, the forms of vida were very simple, but the finding, (simply) - clearly suggests the existence of intelligent beings capable of such technology. Certainly, such beings would had come from other planets. It is possible that a spaceship can had was damaged (or there was an accident) and it was abandoned in place.
It was found also that the parts have reached to the fossilization state in a period of time historicaly and geologically short. Possibly, the “machine” fell into a swamp. Despite the findings, cautious, scientists prefer to consider that the evidences are not definitive – yet. And Gobulev ponders: Refuse the existence of technology [even in past as indented] is a serious mistake because evolution is not linear.
Report originally Misterioso Fossile in Russia: Astronave Antica ZaZoom/IItaly, published in 03 /06/2012
Source: brazilweirdnews russia
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (KBAK/KBFX) — It is a colorless, odorless and tasteless white powder called transglutaminase. It goes by many names, including "meat glue."
It is used for creative dishes by gourmet chefs and to fuse together scraps of meat, to form one solid piece. It is legal to use in the United States.
I recently did a Skype interview with an investigative writer for a website called Activistpost.com. Heather Callaghan is an outspoken meat glue critic and said consumers have been kept in the dark about its use.
"The safety issues that comes up isn't so much the ingredient," Callaghan says. 'My main concern is that a lot of people feel betrayed, they didn't know. They deserve the right to know."
Transglutaminase is classified by the USDA and the FDA as a "GRAS" product. GRAS stands for "generally recognized as safe" when used properly.
I interviewed Kern County's chief environmental health specialist Donna Fenton, who said, "TG is naturally occurring. It's found in bacteria and in plants and animals. What they are doing is taking that specific enzyme and using it as a binder or a glue to keep different forms of meat products that have protein, together."
Even though various articles say the use of transglutaminase could be dangerous due to higher bacteria levels in meat glued foods, Fenton says the enzyme itself is an antibacterial.
Callaghan has just written another article on meat glue, and says it would be tough to track the source of an E coli outbreak if several pieces of meat were stuck together, but adds, "So far we haven't heard any reports of it happening yet, but some people are very worried about it."
Fenton had tips for people trying this substance at home. She says you need to make sure the highest internal temperatures required for safe cooking has been reached.
But when ordering from a restaurant, how do you know that juicy steak you ordered is really one prime cut of meat and not several lesser quality pieces stuck together with meat glue? Some say, you can't. There are several state and federal laws in place geared toward protecting the consumer in grocery stores and restaurants.
The California Retail Food Code reads: "Food offered for human consumption shall be honestly presented in a way that does not mislead for misinform the consumer."
The FDA Food Code reads: "Food or Color Additives, colored overwraps, or lights may not be used to misrepresent the true appearance, color or quality of food."
The Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetic Law reads: "Any food is misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading."
In California, these laws don't just apply to labels.
"Even in menu labeling, they have to indicate if it says it is a steak, it has to be a whole steak, it can't be formed from other pieces of meat," Fenton says. "If they are doing it in a restaurant, it has to be on the menu. If they use that binder to create that meat, it has to be indicated."
Why is banned from countries overseas? The European Parliament voted to ban this type of substance a few years ago, saying it had no proven benefit for consumers and might mislead them instead, according to a report by Healthy Freedom Alliance.
We called more than 20 Kern County businesses, including local and chain restaurants and butcher shops. All but one said they never heard of meat glue.
Local consumers had questions about the long-term health impact of using a substance like this.
"How long has this product been tested? How was it tested?" local consumer Keith Symonds asks.
Another consumer, Lauren Marsh, is worried about possible allergic reactions.
These are issues that Fenton says have merit, but, she says the only health issue found is that those with a gluten allergy may find themselves allergic to it, as well.
What can you do to make sure you are not getting a meat glued steak? Read the menu, read the label, and, when you dine out, Fenton says, "Ask them. If they lie to you, it is a violation.
This story will blow your mind. That’s what usually happens to us when we learn something about the world that seems totally irrational — but true. In this story we are dealing with time, the future to be exact, and the existence of multiple and different futures.
But wait! If you think this is some pseudo-science, you’re dead wrong. Because the proof of this scientificdiscovery comes with a hefty price tag: a global disaster by 2013.
Back in 2008 some predictions were made by a team of the top, military trained “remote viewers” — each with over a decade of successful service. Lyn Buchanan from US Army Intelligence and Glenn Wheaton, of US Special Forces participated in a project run by Farsight Institute originally designed to detect minute climate changes at selected targets around the globe. Instead of climate change, the remote viewers saw a huge meteoric impact in the ocean with devastating tidal waves and volcanism. All this happening by 2013.
The results were unexpected but should be taken seriously. It appears that the governments of the world are already preparing for such an event. The scientific community believes these predictions to be so strong and reliable that they proposed to let the reputation of remote viewing, as a science, rest upon this horrible prediction.
You need to know about this. It’s real. First, what is Remote Viewing?
Remote Viewing is a talent where some individuals can get information from events and places that are far away in both distance and time. The phenomenon is not completely understood but has been repeatedly validated by experiments.
Remote viewing was popularized in the 1990s, following the declassification of documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program sponsored by the U.S. Federal Government to determine if there was any potential military application of psychic phenomena. The program was “terminated” in 1995, citing a lack of documented evidence that the program had any value to the intelligence community. At least that’s the “official” position.
Many believe that the abilities of Remote Viewers are present in most people, and can be developed with the right instruction. That alone is perhaps reason enough to “officially” deny that it has any value.
A brief history of Remote Viewing
One of the most successful remote viewers was Joseph McMoneagle [pictured on the left]. His track record remains classified, however it was impressive enough to have been awarded the U.S. Army’s Legion of Merit Medal, one of the highest meritorious awards given to a civilian in America.
How Remote Viewing Works…
and then those 2012/2013 predictions! In remote viewing there are always three events that take place: the Remote Viewing Attempt (RVA), where the remote viewer actually tries to see the target event in the future. Then there is the target event (TE) — the thing the remote viewer is trying to see — and finally the Task Assignment (TA) — where some person gives the assignment of what the remote viewer should be looking for.
When remote viewing a future event, the traditional protocol was of the order TA – RVA – TE. In other words, some person would sit the remote viewer down and explain the time and location of some future event (TA), then the Remote Viewer would attempt to ‘see’ it and describe it (RVA), and finally there is the actual event that happens later (TE). This makes sense to us. It’s the linear progression of time. But the procedure didn’t always result in good predictions.
Some researchers tried a different sequence of RVA – TE – TA and it worked much better. According to Farsight Institute’s spokesman, Dr. Courtney Brown:
“We have successfully been able to, in a deterministic manner, describe the future each and every time.” [*]
In this protocol, the remote viewer is still attempting to describe a future event, but the person assigning the task does so only after the Remote Viewer has viewed and described the target. Confused?
An example of this highly successful protocol follows: It’s January. The remote viewer is asked to ‘see’ some future event that will be assigned to him in March. With that instruction, some event is seen, written down or drawn and then put in a safe. It is known only to the remote viewer. In March, the target is assigned to the same Remote Viewer — who has already made his predictions two months earlier. The target is some event that happened in February.
It sounds irrational but it works. Why?
The theory is that we live in multiple universes or multiple futures. The path of past-present-future is our reality timeline. From the perspective of the present, the past is fixed and unchangeable. It happened already. But the future appears to take many different paths of possibility. Knowing which path is on our timeline is required to view the real future events. Is this possible?
At each moment we are at an intersection with many paths leading to future events. By placing some known event in the future we are, in effect, calling out or putting up a sign that says, “Over here! This is the real timeline!” In order to “see” the future accurately there must be a “marker” event — an attractor of sorts — to pull us in to certain paths of possibilities. Since the target event was chosen in the future, the unique future where the event happened has been established. The path is then followed by the remote viewer, allowing him to visualize the events of the future. It can therefore be predicted.
Here’s a great video in which Dr. Brown explains the protocol for describing future events. His terms are a bit different from my explanation but the meaning is the same.
Remote Viewing 2012-2013: not good news…
In 2008 a team of 8 military grade remote viewers were asked to view several targets with the understanding that the actual target assignments for each session would be given to them in the future. The sessions were given a number (S1, S2…) and the notes and drawings from each session were collected, scanned, encrypted and subsequently downloaded by tens of thousands of internet users for some future date, when the encryption codes would be published. This guaranteed that the results of the remote viewing sessions could not be changed.
There was a total of 113 sessions. Once the sessions had been recorded, the targets were selected in a random manner, pairing each session with one of three possible target conditions in 9 different locations around the globe:
1. Vaitupu, Tuvalu
2. Fort Jesus, Mombasa Kenya
3. Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia
4. Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
5. United States Congress Building, Washington, D.C.
6. Malé International Airport, Malé, Maldives
7. KITV Building, Honolulu, Hawaii
8. The Vehicle Assembly Building at Launch Complex 39, Kennedy Space Center, Merritt Island, Florida
9. Key West, Florida
The three conditions were:
1. The date of June 2008
A. “June 1, 2013, 12 noon target local time, following the timeline in which the leadership of the mainstream global scientific establishment continues to ignore or deny (1) the reality of the remote-viewing phenomenon, and (2) the existence of life not originating from Earth.”
B. “June 1, 2013, 12 noon target local time, following the timeline in which by the end of 2009 leaders of the mainstream global scientific establishment publicly recognize (1) the reality of the remote-viewin phenomenon, and (2) the existence of life not originating from Earth.”
Each remote viewing session that had already been recorded was associated with a specific geographic location and condition. The results, originally thought to show changes in sea levels and climate, were dramatic.
Those sessions which were linked to assignments in 2008 showed the locations as they were. An example is seen below. This session was linked to the Sydney Opera House (at sea level).
The descriptions of Tanzania’s Mt. Kilimanjaro are also as one would expect in 2008 [below].
But something radically wrong happens when either condition 2013-A or 2013-B is assigned.
Descriptions of something bright in the sky, of people looking up in amazement, followed by mass organized migrations from the coastal regions.
A summary of what was seen by these remote viewers looks like this: In general, these remote-viewing data suggest the following types of physical changes across many of the above geographical locations by mid-2013:
1. Impacts from what appear to be large meteors leading to tsunamis and possible volcanism
2. Extensive and forceful flooding of coastal areas
3. Excessive solar radiation
4. Storms and other severe weather
In terms of the effects of these changes on humans, these data also suggest:
1. Massive self-organized relocation from coastal areas (refugees)
2. The breakdown of rescue or other notable governmental functioning
3. The breakdown of the food supply system
4. The breakdown of the vehicular transport system
5. Extensive loss of buildings near coasts
The Real Cost of the Australian Carbon Tax 
糖分是工業化國家人民最主要的熱量來源。糖分會增加胰島素分泌，促進脂肪累積以及體內的發炎症狀、加速老化過程，並且製造容易導致退化性疾病的環境。
